MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Polyneuropathy in Multiple Myeloma Patients Correlate with the Presence of Autoantibodies (P7.013)

2014· article· en· W1602346905 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adam Niezgoda, S. Michalak, Lidia Gil, Mieczysław Komarnicki, Wojciech Kozubski

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyneuropathyMedicineMultiple myelomaAutoantibodyInternal medicineOncologyImmunologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and goal of the study: Multiple myeloma is a lymphoproliferative disease often requiring neurotoxic treatment (thalidomide/bortezomibe). Patients may develop length dependent axonal polyneuropathy related with the treatment. Because of variable degree of neural involvement in patients with similar MM picture we analyzed the presence of different types of autoantibodies as a possible risk factor of more severe polyneuropathy. DESIGN/METHODS: We selected 36 consecutive patients (age: 55-71, 22 males and 14 females) referred to our clinic because of paresthesias between 2008-2011 with one year history of MM treated with thalidomide/bortezomibe. All of them were examined clinically (Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score, TCNS) and electrophysiologically. We examined the presence of autoantibodies using indirect immunofluorescence (IIF, Euroimmun, Germany) as a screening, and in cases with positive pattern indicating the presence of onconeural antibodies line blot (Euroimmun, Germany)was performed as the confirmation test. IIF enables detection of a spectrum of autoantibodies (anti-myelin associated glycoprotein - MAG, anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase - GAD, anti-glial fibrillary acid protein - GFAP, anti-gangliosides, anti-neuroendothelium, anti-myelin). RESULTS: We found autoantibodies in 20 of them (55%) - 12 (33%) had antibodies against nucleosome antigens (ANA), 4 (11%) had anty-PNMa2/Ta(+/-), 2 (5.5%) anti-myelin and 2 (5.5%) had abnormal granular and molecular layer of cerebellar cortex staining. Mean TCNS score in patients with autoantibodies was significantly higher (mean= 7.5, SD=1.8) than in patients without autoantibodies (mean=3.5, SD 0,7) t-Student test, p<0,05. TCNS correlated with the severity of electrophysiological abnormalities (length-dependent axonal sensory [6 patients] or sensory-motor [14 patients]); no motor involvement was found in the 16 patients without autoantibodies. . CONCLUSIONS: MM patients who develop autoantibodies have higher risk of more severe polyneuropathy with motor fiber involvement in comparison to those without immunological response. EMG-ENG assessment as well as autoantibodies analysis prior to potentially neurotoxic therapy initiation may be helpful in choosing the appropriate drug.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology→Same topicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→