MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<scp>N</scp>iagara Bible Conferences

2011· other· en· W1603199741 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ron J. Bigalke

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization · 2011
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingCovenantHistoryClassicsReligious studiesLawPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Niagara Bible Conferences were part of the late 19th century Bible conference movement. In 1868, the conference was organized in New York as the Believers' Meeting for Bible Study. A new name was acquired when the conference location changed to Niagara‐on‐the‐Lake, Ontario. From 1883–1897, virtually every significant premillennial leader attended the conference. These meetings profoundly impacted Christian workers, evangelists, and preachers. James H. Brookes served as the president for many years, and beginning in 1875 (until his death in 1897), he published the Truth , a premillennial, pretribulational periodical. Another influential leader among premillennialists, Adoniram J. Gordon, began publishing the Watchword in 1878, “an unobtrusive little monthly,” which was covenant premillennial. Controversy was developing at the conference, which was contained based on mutual respect for Brookes; after his death, the differences among leadership became more apparent and the conference no longer convened after 1900. Although he first attended the conferences as a pretribulationist, Robert Cameron later adopted the posttribulational position and became editor of the Watchword and Truth after the deaths of Brookes and Gordon. In 1894, Arno C. Gaebelein began publishing Our Hope , a magazine that communicated pretribulationism but avoided dogmatizing on disputed points among premillennialists. In the early 1880s at the conference, Cameron influenced Nathaniel West to reconsider the imminency of the rapture. During the early 1890s, West vigorously defended posttribulationism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Encyclopedia of Christian CivilizationSame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207