MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1603356718

Uneven Renaissance: Urban Development in Saint John, 1955-1976

2010· article· fr· W1603356718 on OpenAlex
Greg Marquis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Brunswick Studies / Revue d’études sur le Nouveau-Brunswick · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing Market and Economics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe RenaissanceSAINTHumanitiesUrban planningPolitical scienceEconomyEconomic historyHistoryArtArt historyEconomicsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article discusses urban development in Saint John from the mid 1950s to the mid 1970s. Saint John is a mid-sized port city subject to boom-bust economic cycles. In the post-World War II era, business and political leaders promoted an urban renaissance to modernize the city and make it more attractive for investment. Four interrelated policy areas of that renaissance are discussed in this article: urban renewal, transportation infrastructure development, industry and business promotion, and housing. Largely because of amalgamation in 1967, the city’s population peaked in the early 1970s and then began to shift to suburban municipalities. Urban renewal, bridge construction, and highway construction displaced up to 5,000 residents, largely working-class tenants, a minority of whom ended up in public housing. Towards the end of the period, more attention was paid to the social costs of development, but Saint John’s urban renaissance stressed infrastructure and industry over neighbourhoods. Resume L’article etudie le developpement urbain a Saint John du milieu des annees 1950 jusqu’au milieu des annees 1970. Saint John est une ville portuaire moyenne sujette a des cycles d'expansion et de ralentissement economiques. Apres la Seconde guerre mondiale, les personnalites du monde des affaires et les dirigeants politiques ont promu une renaissance urbaine afin de moderniser la ville et la rendre plus interessante pour y faire des investissements. Dans cet article, quatre secteurs de depenses interdependants lies a cette renaissance sont abordes : la renovation urbaine, le developpement de l’infrastructure de transport, la promotion de l’industrie et des affaires et les logements. L’amalgamation adoptee en 1967 a fait que la population de la ville s’est accrue au debut des annees 1970, et a ensuite migre vers les municipalites de banlieue. La renovation urbaine, le pont et la construction routiere ont contribue au demenagement de jusqu’a 5 000 personnes qui etaient, en grande partie, des locataires de la classe ouvriere; une minorite d’entre eux se sont installes dans des logements sociaux. Vers la fin de cette periode, davantage d’attention a ete pretee aux couts sociaux du developpement, mais la renaissance urbaine de Saint John a exploite l’infrastructure et l’industrie avant les voisinages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it