Susceptibility of Diabetic Heart to Catecholamine-induced Arrhythmias is Independent of Contractile Dysfunction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background: Diabetes is associated with myocardial electrical instability and prolongation of action potential duration that result in disturbances in the rhythm of the heart. Objective: Th is study was undertaken to examine the role of circulating catecholamines in abnormal cardiac rhythm and contractility during diff erent stages of diabetes. Methods: Diabetes was induced in male Sprague-Dawley rats with streptozotocin (STZ; 65 mg/kg, i.v.). Epinephrine (4-128 μg/kg, i.v.) -induced arrhythmias and plasma levels of epinephrine (Epi) and norepinephrine (NE) were determined in control, 4- and 8-wk diabetic animals. Echocardiography was used to assess cardiac remodeling and contractile function. Results: Although diabetes induced cardiac dysfunction, there were no significant differences in cardiac output, ejection fraction, left ventricle (LV) dimensions, LV fractional shortening between the 4- and 8-wk diabetic animals. Th e electrocardiogram of both diabetic groups showed deep S wave as well as changes in T wave and ST segment. In addition, prolongation of the RR interval in the 4- and 8-wk diabetic animals was seen, while prolongation of the QT and PR intervals were only seen in the 8-wk diabetic animals. Th e severity of Epi-induced ventricular arrhythmias, as assessed by arrhythmia score, was significantly lower in the 8-wk diabetic rats, as compared to the 4-wk diabetic animals. Circulating Epi levels were significantly decreased in the 8-wk diabetic rats, whereas NE levels were increased in the 4-wk diabetic rats. Conclusions: Th e sensitivity of the diabetic heart to catecholamine- triggered arrhythmias may be dependent on circulating Epi rather than NE and thus it can be proposed that the increased incidence of sudden cardiac death in diabetics may not be associated with response to catecholamines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".