Intein lacking conserved C‐terminal motif G retains controllable N‐cleavage activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A split-intein consists of two complementary fragments (N-intein and C-intein) that can associate to carry out protein trans-splicing. The Ssp GyrB S11 split-intein is an engineered unconventional split-intein consisting of a 150-amino-acid N-intein and an extremely small six-amino-acid C-intein, which comprises the conserved intein motif G. Here, we show that fusion proteins containing the 150-amino-acid N-intein could be triggered to undergo controllable N-cleavage in vitro when the six-amino-acid C-intein or a derivative thereof was added as a synthetic peptide in trans. More importantly, we discovered, unexpectedly, that the 150-amino-acid N-intein could be induced by strong nucleophiles to undergo N-cleavage in vitro, and in Escherichia coli cells, in the absence of the motif G-containing six-amino-acid C-intein. This finding indicated that the first step of the protein splicing mechanism (acyl shift) could occur in the absence of the entire motif G. Extensive kinetic analyses revealed that both the motif G residues and the Ser+1 residue positively influenced N-cleavage rate constants and yields. The 150-amino-acid N-intein could also tolerate various unrelated sequences appended to its C-terminus without disruption of the N-cleavage function, suggesting that the catalytic pocket of the intein has considerable structural flexibility. Our findings reveal interesting insights into intein structure-function relationships, and demonstrate a new and potentially more useful method of controllable, intein-mediated N-cleavage for protein engineering applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".