Mixed-member electoral systems : the best of both worlds?
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
Part 1 Placing mixed-member systems in the world of electoral systems: Matthew Soberg Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg, mixed-member electoral systems - a definition and typology Matthew Shugart, extreme electoral systems and the appeal of the mixed-member alternative. Part 2 Origins of mixed-member systems: Susan E. Scarrow, Germany - the mixed-member system as a political compromise David Denemark, choosing MMP in New Zealand - explaining the 1993 electoral reform Richard S. Katz, reforming the Italian electoral law, 1993 Gideon Rahat, the politics of reform in Israel - how the Israeli mixed system came to be Steven R. Reed and Michael F. Thies, the causes of electoral reform in Japan Brian F. Crisp and Juan Carlos Rey, the sources of electoral reform in Venezuela Rene Antonio Mayorga, electoral reform in Bolivia - origins of the mixed-member proportional system Juan Molinar Horcasitas and Jeffrey Weldon, reforming electoral systems in Mexico John W. Schiemann, hedging against uncertainty - regime change and the origins of Hungary's mixed-Member system Robert G. Moser and Frank C. Thames Jr, compromise amidst political conflict, the origins of Russia's mixed-member system. Part 3 Consequences of mixed-member systems: Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Bernhard Wessels, the political consequences of Germany's mixed-member system - personalization at the grass roots? Fiona Barker, Jonathan Boston, Stephen Levine, Elizabeth McLeay and Nigel S. Roberts, an initial assessment of the consequences of MMP in New Zealand Roberto D'Alimonte, mixed electoral rules, partisan realignment, and party system change in Italy Reuven Y. Hazan, the Israeli mixed electoral system - unexpected reciprocal and cumulative consequences Steven R. Reed and Michael F. Thies, the consequences of electoral reform in Japan Michael R. Kulisheck and Brian F. Crisp, the legislative consequences of MMP electoral rules in Venezuela Rene Antonio Mayorga, the mixed-member proportional system and its consequences in Bolivia Jeffrey Weldon, the consequences of the Mexicos mixed electoral system, 1988-1997 Kenneth Benoit, evaluating Hungary's mixed-member electoral system Robert G. Moser, the consequences of Russia's mixed-member electoral system. Part 4 Prospects for reform in other countries: David M. Farrell, the United Kingdom comes of age - the British electoral reform revolution of the 1990s R. Kent Weaver, electoral rules and electoral reform in Canada Matthew Soberg Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg, are mixed-member systems the best of both worlds?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Topic
- European and International Law Studies
- Field
- Social Sciences
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- CompromisePoliticsElectoral systemPolitical scienceElectoral reformTypologyElectoral geographyEconomic historyPolitical economyLawLaw and economicsSociologyGeographyHistoryDemocracyArchaeology
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes