MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1604482639 · doi:10.1080/09581596.2015.1067672

“Years ago”: reconciliation and First Nations narratives of tuberculosis in the Canadian Prairie Provinces

2015· article· en· W1604482639 on OpenAlex
Sara Komarnisky, P. A. Hackett, Sylvia Abonyi, Courtney Heffernan, Richard Long

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Public Health · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousTuberculosisNarrativeContext (archaeology)MedicineHealth carePolitical scienceEthnologyEconomic growthGender studiesGeographyHistorySociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractFor First Nations tuberculosis (TB) patients in the Prairie Provinces, the past matters. In this paper, we draw on the analysis of historical statements made by 20 First Nations interviewees with infectious TB to explore the function of talking about the past in relation to a current diagnosis of TB and the implications of historicity on contemporary TB prevention, programming and care. Despite interviewees not being asked directly about past contexts of TB treatment, they talked about historical topics such as the removal of First Nations TB patients from communities for treatment in distant sanatoria, painful and invasive surgical procedures once used to treat TB, and the attitudes that persist due to the ongoing failure to eliminate TB from First Nations communities. In these narratives, past experiences of TB treatment are intimately connected to present-day experiences and context. What happened 'years ago' profoundly affects the health and well-being of people diagnosed with TB today. Attempts to eliminate TB among First Nations peoples in Canada must also address its historical legacy. Understanding the contemporary effects of past TB treatment and mistreatment among First Nations peoples in the Prairie Provinces can also be seen as part of a larger project of truth and reconciliation in Canada, which involves both Indigenous and non-Indigenous Canadians.Keywords: CanadaIndigenous health researchtuberculosispersonal narrativescolonialismhistorical contextreconciliationhistoricity AcknowledgementsA sincere thank you to all of the participants who shared their experiences of TB with us. We gratefully acknowledge the work of the entire data collection and analysis team for the Determinants of Tuberculosis Transmission Project.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThe Determinants of Tuberculosis Transmission Project was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Canada (CIHR) and Health Canada [grant number #151631]. This research was also supported by a CIHR Population Health Intervention Research (PHIR) 'Informing the Strategy against Tuberculosis for First Nations on-Reserve: Evidence from the DTT Project (2012)' [grant number #297723].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it