MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The regulation of the cell surface proteome by AMP‐activated protein kinase (604.5)

2014· article· en· W1604857132 on OpenAlexaff
Eden Ross, Costin N. Antonescu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiotin and Related Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCell biologyProteomeBiotinylationAMPKCellProtein kinase ACell adhesionEndocytosisChemistryBiologyAMP-activated protein kinaseProteomicsKinaseBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The many proteins at the cell surface (collectively, the cell surface proteome) control numerous cellular functions. The amount of each protein at the cell surface is dynamically controlled by endocytosis and recycling. AMP‐activated protein kinase (AMPK) is an important metabolic regulator that responds to energetic stress, such as increased cellular AMP:ATP and certain hormones. Studies examining a small number of cell surface proteins suggest that AMPK may have an important role in regulating endomembrane traffic. How AMPK may more broadly regulate the cell surface proteome is not known. We have refined a method to isolate the cell surface proteome from cultured cells, involving biotinylation of surface‐exposed proteins in intact cells and purification of biotinylated proteins, which we coupled to quantitative mass spectrometry to identify novel AMPK‐regulated membrane traffic phenomena. We find that activation of AMPK results in a decrease in the cell surface abundance of the β1‐integrin, revealing a mechanism by which cellular metabolism may regulate cell adhesion and migration. Our results provide novel insight into the regulation of the cell surface proteome by metabolic stress signaling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicBiotin and Related StudiesFrench-language works237,207