MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1604906445 · doi:10.1071/rdv17n2ab66

66 IN VITRO DEVELOPMENT OF YAK (POEPHAGUS MUTUS) CLONED EMBRYOS BY INTERSPECIES SOMATIC NUCLEAR TRANSFER

2004· article· en· W1604906445 on OpenAlexafffund
Lei Su, Fuliang Du, Li‐Ying Sung, Shuo Yang, Byeong‐Seon Jeong, Sandra Casinghino, T. L. Nedambale, Jia-Seng Xu, Cindy Tian, Xusan Yang, Wei Ji

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsCytoplastBiologySomatic cell nuclear transferBlastocystAndrologyEmbryo cultureSomatic cellEmbryoCryopreservationReproductive technologyMolecular biologyCell biologyEmbryogenesisGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interspecies nuclear transfer (NT) is an important tool for preservation of endangered animal species. This study was carried out to clone Yak (Poephagus mutus) embryos by using Yak skin fibroblasts and bovine (Bos taurus) recipient cytoplasts, and to compare the efficiency of YAK interspecies NT (bovine cytoplast-Yak donor cell) and bovine somatic NT (bovine cytoplast-bovine donor cell). Recipient oocytes were extracted from antral follicles of bovine ovaries, and subsequently cultured in maturation medium for 18–20 h in 5% CO2 and 95% humidified air at 39°C. Cumulus cells were removed from the oocytes by vortexing also facilitated further enucleation. Yak skin fibroblast cells were prepared from cultured ear explants of an adult 5-year-old female. Fibroblasts were cultured at passage 6–9 in 10% FBS DMEM at 37°C in 5% CO2 humidified air. The donor cell at a diameter of 19–20 µm was inserted into the perivitelline space of an enucleated oocyte. A bovine female cell line at similar passage number was used for bovine somatic NT as control. Somatic cell-cytoplast pairs were then fused by applying two direct current pulses at 2.0 kV/cm for a duration of 6–10 µs/pulse. Fused embryos were activated in 10 µg/mL cycloheximide and 2.5 µg/mL cytochalasin D in M199 plus 7.5% FBS for 5 h. Reconstructed Yak embryos were cultured in CR1aa plus 6 mg/mL BSA for 2 days (initiation of activation = Day 0) at 39°C, 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2, and then in 7.5% FBS CR1aa medium for 5 successive days on bovine cumulus monolayers. Expanding and hatching blastocysts on Day 7 were recorded and cryopreserved for further embryo transfer trials. The percentage of cleavage and the development to morulae and blastocysts were statistically analyzed using a General Linear Model (GLM, Univariate, SPSS 9.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). As indicated in Table 1, the results demonstrated that the efficiencies of fusion rate as well as developmental potential in vitro were significantly higher in the bovine somatic NT group compared to those of the Yak interspecies NT group. However, the morphology and cell number per embryo of interspecies Yak cloned embryos were indistinguishable from those of bovine NT embryos. Our data suggest that bovine oocytes possess the capability of reprogramming/reactivation of the genome from differentiated somatic Yak nuclei. Table 1. Comparison of yak interspecies and bovine somatic nuclear transfer

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.914

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207