Pharmacogenomics and Personality: Role of CYP2D6 and Implications for Psychopathology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CYP2D6 polymorphism is related to absent (poor metabolizers, PMs) and normal/decreased (extensive metabolizers, including ultrarapid metabolizers) metabolism of clinically important drugs. Moreover CYP2D6 is also involved in the metabolism of endogenous substrates in the brain which appear highly important for psychological functioning that may be related to normal and abnormal behavioral tendencies or psychopathology. Although there are contradictory results, a lot of support has been given to the role of CYP2D6 activity on behavioral and mental functions. PMs have been consistently associated with a personality profile characterized by impulsive- and anxiety-related features. Despite these psychological features often being linked to psychopathology, there also appears to be evidence suggesting that PMs could present some protective features against the development of mental disorders. In keeping with this notion, PMs were found to perform better in a sustained attention cognitive task, which is impaired in different syndromes characterized by high vulnerability to stress and impulsivity such as schizophrenia or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, etc. In conclusion, there are data supporting the view that CYP2D6 may influence not only variability of drug response but also psychological functioning, and hence may be related to vulnerability to psychopathology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".