Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents: Introduction, Alison Diduck. Part I Changing Intimacies a the Theory: On the way to a post-familial family: from a community of need to elective affinities, Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim Intimacy transformed? A critical look at the 'pure relationship', Lynn Jamieson. Part II Changing Intimacies a Empirical Research: Why marry? a perceptions of the affianced, Mary Hibbs, Chris Barton and Joanne Beswick Why don't they marry? Cohabitation, commitment and DIY marriage, Simon Duncan, Anne Barlow and Grace James Cohabitation and commitment: partnership plans of young men and women, Lynn Jamieson, Michael Anderson, David McCrone, Frank Bechofer, Robert Stewart and Yaojun Li Marriage and the moral bases of personal relationships, John Eekelaar and Mavis Maclean The significance of marriage: contrasts between white British and ethnic minority groups in England, Mavis Maclean and John Eekelaar Regulation of intimacy and love semantics in couples living apart together, Bernadette Bawin-Legros and Anne Gauthier Cultures of intimacy and care beyond 'the family': personal life and social change in the early 21st century, Sasha Roseneil and Shelley Budgeon. Part III Why Legal Regulation At All?: The Marriage Act 1753: a case study in family law-making, Stephen Parker Debates and issues regarding marriage and cohabitation in the British and American literature, Jane Lewis Homosexual rights, Brenda Hale. Part IV Law and Marriage: The case against legal recognition of cohabitation, Ruth L. Deech Marriage and the good of obligation, Scott Fitzgibbon Just marriage: on the public importance of private unions, Mary Lyndon Shanley Contract marriage a the way forward or dead end?, David McLellan The tide in favour of equality: same-sex marriage in Canada and England and Wales, Wade K. Wright Why marriage?, Martha Albertson Fineman Marriage is for heterosexuals a may the rest of us be saved from it, Kenneth McK. Norrie We will get what we ask for: why legalizing gay and lesbian marriage will not 'dismantle the legal structure of gender in every marriage', Nancy D. Polikoff Law, women and the family: the question of polygyny in a new South Africa, Felicity Kaganas and Christina Murray. Part V Law and Civil Registration: The PACS and marriage and cohabitation in France, Claude Martin and IrAne ThA(c)ry Couplings: civil partnership in the United Kingdom, Carl F. Stychin. Part VI Law and Conjugal Cohabitation: Regulation of cohabitation, changing family policies and social attitudes: a discussion of Britain within Europe, Anne Barlow Legal treatment of cohabitation in the United States, Cynthia Grant Bowman. Part VII Law and Non-Conjugal Relationships: Why we should care about friends: an argument for queering the care imaginary in social policy, Sasha Roseneil Displacing the 'conjugal' family in legal policy a a progressive move?, Lisa Glennon Name index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.071 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".