New directions in restorative justice : issues, practice, evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Part 1: Restorative Justice and Youth 1. Towards Restoration As the Mainstream In Youth Justice, Lode Walgrave 2. Restorative Justice In Schools, Brenda Morrison 3. Achieving Effective Outcomes In Youth Justice: Implications of New Research For Principles, Policy and Practice, Gabrielle Maxwell 4. The Canadian Youth Criminal Justice Act and Restorative Justice, Serge Charbonneau Part 2: Aboriginal Justice and Restorative Justice 5. Aboriginal Justice and Restorative Justice, Jonathan Rudin 6. Indigenous Youth and the Criminal Justice System In Australia, John Boersig 7. Gladue Was A Woman: The Importance of Gender In Restorative Based Sentencing, Josephine Savarese Part 3: Victimization and Restorative Justice 8. A Tale of Two Studies: Restorative Justice From A Victims' Perspective, Kathleen Daly 9. Restorative Justice: A Healing Approach To Elder Abuse, Arlene Groh 10. Exploring Treatment and Trauma Recovery Implications of Facilitating Victim Offender Encounters In Crimes of Severe Violence: Lessons From the Canadian Experience, David Gustafson 11. The Involvement of Insurance Companies In Restorative Processes, Melissa Oullette Part 4: Evaluating Restorative Justice 12. Penetrating the Walls: Implementing A System-Wide Restorative Justice Approach In the Justice System, Don Clairmont 13. Restorative Justice In Cases of Serious Crime: An Evaluation, Tanya Rugge and Robert Cormier 14. Evaluating Conferencing For Serious Juvenile Offenders, Inge Vanfraechem 15. Evaluation and Restorative Justice Principles, Howard Zehr
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".