Bibliographic record
Abstract
An 11-month old girl is presented to you for developmental delay. The child started to roll over at four months of age and sit independently at approximately seven months of age. Afterwards, she gradually regressed and could no longer achieve these motor milestones. In the past few weeks, she lost the ability to hold her head straight or bear weight on her legs. Her babbling and smiling have decreased, and she does not seem to be interested in her surroundings. The pregnancy and delivery were uneventful, and there is no history of neonatal complications, febrile illnesses or head injuries. The family reports that she received her first three pentavalent immunizations. An analysis of family history was negative for developmental delay; however, the parents are distant cousins. On examination, the child was unable to sit, roll or bear weight on her legs. Her eyes fixed poorly on objects and she did not reach for them. Her trunk and limb muscular tone was poor, while the muscle bulk remained normal. Deep tendon reflexes were hard to obtain. In view of the developmental deterioration and abnormal neurological examination, the patient was referred to a paediatric neurologist.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".