Bibliographic record
Abstract
The break-up of "the second" Yugoslavia (1945-1991) marked the introduction of a new system of political, economic and social relations in the region. 1 Instead of one, relatively large Eastern-European country, several new states -Slovenia, Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, as well as Macedonia and the FR Yugoslavia -have emerged. Bosnia and Herzegovina consists of the Muslim-Croat Federation and the Republic of Srpska, while the FR Yugoslavia is comprised of Serbia and Montenegro. 2 The legal status of Kosovo remains unresolved. Changes to the basic type of social relations that were established according to the ideological mantra of communism in the second Yugoslavia, and applied in a more liberal fashion than in other communist states in Eastern Europe, constituted a significant alteration of the earlier dominant cultural model in the newly formed Yugoslav successor states. Instead of the multiculturalism and polyconfessionality that characterized the former multinational union, national/cultural autism prevailed in these former Yugoslav republics. National culture formulated along the lines "I am I" because I do not possess any links to, or similarities with, the "other" gradually hypostatized into the essential measuring tape for the establishment and verification of the relevance of any given work of art. Individual "I"s and collective "we"s are validated by the fact of their own existence, and the superiority of such a presence is then manifested not only through the radicalization of difference regarding the "other," but also through the complete denial of the "other." This is the logic of an ugly paradox: "they" prevent us from being "us"; "I" is not possible if the "other" exists. Half a century of cultural interaction -culture being, above all, the collection of various individual social interactions -turned into its own radical opposite during the early war years of the 1990s. 3 National cultures (Serbian,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.015 | 0.015 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".