MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ANTIMICROBIAL EFFECT OF CINNAMON BARK EXTRACT ON <i>ESCHERICHIA COLI</i> O157:H7, <i>LISTERIA INNOCUA</i> AND FRESH‐CUT APPLE SLICES

2008· article· en· W1606351878 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Safety · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEssential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Department of Agriculture
FundersU.S. Food and Drug AdministrationDepartment of Agriculture, Nova Scotia
KeywordsAntimicrobialFood scienceListeriaChemistryBark (sound)Escherichia coliCinnamic acidPreservativeListeria monocytogenesBiologyBacteriaBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The potential for natural antimicrobial compounds extracted from true cinnamon ( Cinnamomum zeylanicum Nees ) to use as a food additive to extend the shelf life of fresh‐cut apples was investigated. Several different extracts were prepared using cinnamon bark and powder to evaluate their antimicrobial activity on two marker microorganisms, Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Listeria innocua. An ethanolic extract of cinnamon bark (2% w/v) inhibited the growth of E. coli and L. innocua by 94 and 87%, respectively. When incorporated in a commercial antibrowning dipping solution, FreshExtend, the cinnamon bark extract (1% w/v) reduced significantly (P &lt; 0.05) the microbial growth on apple slices stored for 12 days at 6C in comparison to the control. The cinnamon extract had no influence on the antibrowning properties of FreshExtend. Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry analysis showed that the major chemical constituent of this extract is cinnamic aldehyde. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS The consumer demand for convenient and nutritious, minimally processed produce like fresh‐cut apples has been steadily increasing. Identification of natural antimicrobial agents that are acceptable to the consumer is a challenge to the fresh‐cut industry. In this study, we discovered antimicrobial properties of a cinnamon extract and identified the principal antimicrobial compound as cinnamic aldehyde. For the first time, we demonstrated that this generally recognized as safe (GRAS) compound could be used with a commercial post‐cut dipping solution (FreshExtend) to inhibit significantly the microbial growth on refrigerated apple slices. Therefore, this innovative study provides a new insight into the possible use of cinnamon extracts or cinnamic aldehyde as natural antimicrobial agents in the processing of sliced apples and other minimally processed fruits and vegetables to assure the microbial food safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it