MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1606408023

Representations of Poverty in Canada's Daily Press: An Exploratory Study of Contending Poverty Paradigms

2002· dissertation· en· W1606408023 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kate Rafter

Bibliographic record

VenueSummit (Simon Fraser University) · 2002
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia Studies and Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPovertyMainstreamCulture of povertyUnderclassPolitical scienceGlobeSociologyBasic needsPsychologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis explores the ways in which Canadian poverty is represented in mainstream Canadian news media.The examination begins with the dominant poverty paradigms that characterize current poverty discourse.These paradigms, identified as Individual Responsibility, Structural Responsibility, and the Culture of Poverty, help to structure the ways that poverty has been and continues to be articulated.The paradigm of Individual Responsibility suggests that the individual is ultimately responsible for his or her own socio-economic conditions.The paradigm of Structural Responsibility suggests that various socio-economic structures are responsible for the creation of poverty and the subsequent management of the poor.The Culture of Poverty paradigm and its RightWing variant the Underclass suggest that due to isolation from the non-poor mainstream society, certain poor communities have developed a variety of specific and sometimes deviant characteristics and values that promote the reproduction of poverty within that community.This discussion is followed by a theoretical overview of representation, discourse, and the codes and techniques associated with the production of "objective" news.Here, this thesis discusses the importance of the inverted pyramid, frames of reference, primary definers, and constructed dichotomies.Finally, this thesis offers a content analysis of poverty articles as they appear over a 2-month period in The Vancouver Sun, The Vancouver Province, and The Globe and Mail, three largecirculation Canadian newspapers.Based upon this analysis, this thesis suggests that news media tend to reinforce beliefs associated with the paradigm of Structural Responsibility.This is due to such factors as news media's preference for official and institutional interpretations of events and issues, the prevalence of stories about particular institutions and structural decisions, the dominance of stories written by generalists trained to recognize and maximize general newsworthiness, and the prevalence of event-based coverage.recent coverage of the issue.Chapter 3 introduces the news study by establishing the representational function of news.It provides a theoretical overview of discourse, representation, and techniques associated with the "regime of objectivity" ' .Chapters 4 and 5 detail an analysis of news articles3 pertaining to poverty as they occur in three popular Canadian newspapers: the Vancouver Sun, the Vancouver Province, and the Globe and Mail.Chapter 4 outlines the general characteristics of the entire sample, with emphasis on general topic areas and news values, and their relationship to the poverty paradigms.Chapter 5 examines two artificially constructed weeks for the types of poverty reported, accessed sources, and presented causes, effects, and solutions.Based upon this analysis, the study reveals which, if any, of the poverty paradigms is favoured by news media and therefore dominate popular news discourse.2 The "regime of objectivity" is a useful term that refers to the processes and techniques associated with credible news reporting.It also reflects the understanding that all representation is subjective.It is a term used at length by Robert A. Hackett and Yuezhi Zhao (1998) in their book, Sustaining Democracy?Journalism and the Politics of Objectivity.3 This thesis is concerned with the representations of poverty in traditional news stories.These are stories, written in "inverted pyramid" format, demonstrate a clear attempt by the journalist to follow the "regime of objectivity" and to distance himlherself from the story.In this way, they are distinct from columns, editorials, and letters to the editor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0150.029
Science and technology studies0.0240.013
Scholarly communication0.0190.005
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSummit (Simon Fraser University)Same topicMedia Studies and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207