MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1606541167

Objectifs de carriere au secondaire : les eleves connaissent-ils les moyens pour les atteindre, et est-ce important?

2009· preprint· fr· W1606541167 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marc Frenette

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2009
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Systems and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les eleves savent-ils quelles etudes leur permettront d'atteindre leurs objectifs de carriere? Ces renseignements sont-ils associes a leur parcours scolaire? Afin de repondre a ces questions, nous utilisons l'Enquete aupres des jeunes en transition, cohorte A, pour effectuer une comparaison entre, d'une part, la perception qu'ont les eleves du secondaire du niveau d'instruction requis pour travailler dans la profession qu'ils souhaitent exercer a l'age de 30 ans et, d'autre part, le niveau requis selon les l'analystes du marche du travail de Ressources humaines et Developpement des competences Canada (RHDCC). L'accent est mis sur les eleves qui ont l'intention d'exercer une profession qui necessite un grade universitaire. L'etude examine par ailleurs la relation entre la connaissance des etudes requises et l'inscription subsequente a l'universite. Selon les resultats, parmi les eleves ayant l'intention d'exercer une profession qui necessite un grade universitaire, environ trois sur quatre sont conscients du niveau d'instruction requis. Les resultats obtenus semblent indiquer que la connaissance des etudes requises est liee au rendement scolaire et aux antecedents socioeconomiques. Les differences selon la profession visee sont minimes. En outre, les eleves qui sont conscients de la necessite d'un grade universitaire ont plus de chances de frequenter l'universite, meme en tenant compte des differences sur le plan des resultats scolaires, du sexe et du contexte socioeconomique. De fait, la connaissance des etudes requises est etroitement liee a la frequentation universitaire et a d'autres caracteristiques bien connues comme le sexe, les resultats scolaires et le niveau d'etudes des parents. Enfin, on observe un taux de frequentation universitaire plus eleve chez les eleves qui ont pris conscience plus tot de la necessite d'un grade universitaire pour realiser leur aspiration professionnelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsSame topicEducation Systems and PolicyFrench-language works237,207