Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desde os anos 1980, as novas interrogações identitárias que caracterizam toda uma corrente do romance quebequense contemporâneo constituem o ponto de observação privilegiado da crítica (e da pesquisa literária) no Quebec e em outros lugares. Este estudo se propõe fazer um balanço provisório dos vinte últimos anos de uma reflexão crítica sensível à reconfiguração das estratégias interculturais e das representações identitárias na ficção narrativa no Quebec. Ele dará conta de problemáticas diversas tais como: americanidade, heterogeneidade linguageira, nomadismo memonal, escritura “no feminino” e escritura "migrante”, metaficção assim como a textualização do saber crítico.Résumé: Depuis les années 1980, les nouvelles interrogations identitaires qui caractérisent tout un courant du roman québécois contemporain constituent le point d’observation privilégié de la critique (et la recherche littéraire) au Québec et ailleurs. Cette étude se propose de faire un bilan provisoire de vingt dernières années d’une réflexion critique sensible à la reconfiguration des enjeux interculturels et des représentations identiatires dans la fiction narrative au Québec. Elle tiendra compte des problématiques diverses, telles que: 1’ américanité, 1’ hétérogénéité langagière, le nomadisme mémoriel, l’ecriture "au féminin” et l’écriture “migrante”, la métafiction ainsi que la textualisation du savoir critique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".