The Sacred Fire: The Legacy of Antonio Lamer (Chief Justice of Canada)/Le Feu Sacré : L’Héritage D’Antonio Lamer, Juge En Chef Du Canada (French)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is the Table of Contents and the introduction from the book 'The Sacred Fire: The Legacy of Antonio Lamer (Chief Justice of Canada) / Le Feu Sacre: L’Heritage D’Antonio Lamer, Juge En Chef Du Canada. The book is a collection of essays on different aspects of Chief Justice Lamer's legacy. It contains a preface by Chief Justice Beverly McLachlin, a biographical essay by the Chief Justice of Quebec, the Honourable Michel Robert, a chronology and a list of Lamer CJ.'s judgments. Contributors and topics include: The Lamer Legacy for Judicial Independence (Ed Ratushny & Daphne Gilbert); The Ambivalence of Administrative Justice in Canada: Does Canada Need a Fourth Branch? (Lorne Sossin); Institutional Roles and Chief Justice Lamer’s Aboriginal Rights Jurisprudence (Dwight Newman); Chief Justice Lamer and Policy Design at the Supreme Court of Canada (Adam M. Dodek); Le juge Lamer, la faute, le blâme et le châtiment (Professor Anne-Marie Boisvert); Control of the Process: The Criminal Procedure Jurisprudence of Chief Justice Lamer (Jula Hughes); Lamer, the Exclusion of Evidence and the Scent of Truth 1975-2000 (The Honourable Patrick Healy); Antonio Lamer and Wrongful Convictions: A Journey from Confidence to Contrition (Stephen Bindman); To the rescue: Antonio Lamer and the Section 2(b) cases from Quebec (Jamie Cameron); Chief Justice Lamer and Freedom of Expression: Principle, Pragmatism and “The Boys of St. Vincent” (Catherine Beagan Flood); La pensee du tres honorable Antonio Lamer dans la construction du droit a l’egalite : une vision audacieuse et creatrice (The Honourable Michele Rivet & Manon Montpetit); L'evolution de la pensee du juge en chef Lamer relativement aux fondements des garanties constitutionnelles en matiere de langues officielles (The Honourable Michel Bastarache); Chief Justice Lamer’s Leadership in Feminist Times (Catherine Dauvergne); Antonio Lamer et le droit prive (Daniel Jutras); De l’absence d’esbroufe dans le traitement des faits sociaux en contexte constitutionnel : la retenue meconnue du juge Antonio Lamer (Danielle Pinard); Hearsay Evidence – Lamer’s Common Law Legacy (The Honourable James O’Reilly); Antonio Lamer and Section 7 of the Charter: A Law Reformer’s Ambition, A Judge’s Restraint (The Honourable Robert Sharpe) and A Lamentation for Law Reform (Rod MacDonald).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".