MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607008568

The Sacred Fire: The Legacy of Antonio Lamer (Chief Justice of Canada)/Le Feu Sacré : L’Héritage D’Antonio Lamer, Juge En Chef Du Canada (French)

2009· article· fr· W1607008568 on OpenAlexaffabout
Adam M. Dodek, Daniel Jutras

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCriminal Law and Evidence
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomic JusticeJurisprudenceLawPolitical scienceSupreme courtSociologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is the Table of Contents and the introduction from the book 'The Sacred Fire: The Legacy of Antonio Lamer (Chief Justice of Canada) / Le Feu Sacre: L’Heritage D’Antonio Lamer, Juge En Chef Du Canada. The book is a collection of essays on different aspects of Chief Justice Lamer's legacy. It contains a preface by Chief Justice Beverly McLachlin, a biographical essay by the Chief Justice of Quebec, the Honourable Michel Robert, a chronology and a list of Lamer CJ.'s judgments. Contributors and topics include: The Lamer Legacy for Judicial Independence (Ed Ratushny & Daphne Gilbert); The Ambivalence of Administrative Justice in Canada: Does Canada Need a Fourth Branch? (Lorne Sossin); Institutional Roles and Chief Justice Lamer’s Aboriginal Rights Jurisprudence (Dwight Newman); Chief Justice Lamer and Policy Design at the Supreme Court of Canada (Adam M. Dodek); Le juge Lamer, la faute, le blâme et le châtiment (Professor Anne-Marie Boisvert); Control of the Process: The Criminal Procedure Jurisprudence of Chief Justice Lamer (Jula Hughes); Lamer, the Exclusion of Evidence and the Scent of Truth 1975-2000 (The Honourable Patrick Healy); Antonio Lamer and Wrongful Convictions: A Journey from Confidence to Contrition (Stephen Bindman); To the rescue: Antonio Lamer and the Section 2(b) cases from Quebec (Jamie Cameron); Chief Justice Lamer and Freedom of Expression: Principle, Pragmatism and “The Boys of St. Vincent” (Catherine Beagan Flood); La pensee du tres honorable Antonio Lamer dans la construction du droit a l’egalite : une vision audacieuse et creatrice (The Honourable Michele Rivet & Manon Montpetit); L'evolution de la pensee du juge en chef Lamer relativement aux fondements des garanties constitutionnelles en matiere de langues officielles (The Honourable Michel Bastarache); Chief Justice Lamer’s Leadership in Feminist Times (Catherine Dauvergne); Antonio Lamer et le droit prive (Daniel Jutras); De l’absence d’esbroufe dans le traitement des faits sociaux en contexte constitutionnel : la retenue meconnue du juge Antonio Lamer (Danielle Pinard); Hearsay Evidence – Lamer’s Common Law Legacy (The Honourable James O’Reilly); Antonio Lamer and Section 7 of the Charter: A Law Reformer’s Ambition, A Judge’s Restraint (The Honourable Robert Sharpe) and A Lamentation for Law Reform (Rod MacDonald).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0250.011
Scholarly communication0.0120.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicCriminal Law and EvidenceFrench-language works237,207