MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1607264115

Les habits de l'identité maya yucatèque moderne

2002· article· fr· W1607264115 on OpenAlexaff
Mélissa Gauthier

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterial Culture Review / Revue de la culture matérielle · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClothingMayaEthnologyAdornmentHumanitiesStyle (visual arts)PopulationGeographyHistorySociologyArtAnthropologyArchaeologyDemography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the Yucatan, the population is referred to as mestizo in reference to its regional clothing, or as catrine for its Western clothing. The description and analysis provided of how people dressed in different eras calls into question whether the nature of the influence of Western apparel in mestizo clothing systems is in fact always the same. The period of conquest, marked by missionaries' obsession with clothing the naked bodies of Indians and by the use of clothing to reinforce the social order of the colony, led to the creation of the temo, a garment specific to the mestizos that is similar to the indigenous huipil, but distinct in its adornment. The adoption of the terno as the festive costume of the Yucatan in the 1840s by women dressed in the European style can be interpreted as a political strategy by the bourgeoisie, trying to show the Yucatan as a mestizo society. At the beginning of the twentieth century, this region of Mexico was inhabited by gentes de vestido dressed in the European style and by mestizos wearing mainly the distinctive Yucatan costume. Today, the variety ofhuipiles worn in rural areas reveals the coexistence of different cultures in Mayan communities. Resume Au Yucatan, des habitants sont appeles mestizos en reference a leurs habits regionaux et d'autres, cabines d'apres leurs vetements occidentaux. Dans cet article, la description et l'analyse de certaines pratiques vestimentaires a differentes epoques remettent en question le caractere immuable de la circulation des modes occidentales dans le systeme d'habillement mestizo. La periode de la conquete, marquee par l'obsession des missionnaires de vetir les corps denudes des « Indiens mayas » et l'utilisation du vetement pour renforcer la structure sociale de la colonie, a fait naitre une tenue exclusive aux mestizas, le terno, semblable au huipil indigene mais distinct par l'ornementation. L'adoption du terno comme costume festif yucateque dans les annees 1840 par les femmes vetues a l'europeenne peut etre interpretee comme une strategie politique de la bourgeoisie visant a presenter le Yucatan comme une societe mestiza. Au debut du XXe siecle, cette region du Mexique comptait des gentes de vestido habilles a l'europeenne et des mestizos arborant en principe le costume yucateque distinctif De nos jours, la diversite des huipiles portes en milieu rural revele la coexistence de codes culturels alternatifs dans les communautes mayas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.230

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterial Culture Review / Revue de la culture matérielle→Same topicCultural Identity and Heritage→French-language works237,207→