The Lysosomal Trafficking of Acid Sphingomyelinase is Mediated by Sortilin and Mannose 6‐phosphate Receptor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acid sphingomyelinase (ASM), a member of the saposin-like protein (SAPLIP) family, is a lysosomal hydrolase that converts sphingomyelin to ceramide. Deficiency of ASM causes a variant form of Niemann-Pick disease. The mechanism of lysosomal targeting of ASM is poorly known. Previous studies suggest that ASM could use in part the mannose 6-phosphate receptor (M6P-Rc). Sortilin, a type I transmembrane glycoprotein that belongs to a novel family of receptor proteins, presents structural features of receptors involved in lysosomal targeting. In this study we examined the hypothesis that sortilin may be implicated in the trafficking of ASM to the lysosomes. Using a dominant-negative sortilin construct lacking the cytoplasmic tail, which is essential to recruit adaptor proteins and clathrin, we demonstrated that sortilin is also involved in the lysosomal targeting of ASM. Confocal microscopy revealed that truncated sortilin partially inhibited the lysosomal trafficking of ASM in COS-7 cells and abolished the lysosomal targeting of ASM in I-cells. Pulse-chase experiments corroborated that sortilin is involved in normal sorting of newly synthesized ASM. Furthermore, over-expression of truncated sortilin accelerated and enhanced the secretion of ASM from COS-7 cells and I-cells. Co-immunoprecipitation assays confirmed the interaction between sortilin and ASM. In conclusion, ASM uses sortilin as an alternative receptor to be targeted to the lysosomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".