Teaching Czech German Refugees at Tate Creek, British Columbia, During World War II
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper explores the experiences of two teachers of Czech German refugees who settled at Tate Creek, British Columbia after Hitler’s annexation of the Sudetenland in 1938. In an era which pre-dates the genesis of the term “English as a Second Language” (ESL), Amy (Brown) Dauphinee and Celia (Stickney) Dowding employed pedagogical techniques that closely resembled those advocated by today’s ESL experts. This research also raises questions about the roles schools played in Canada’s war effort. The extent to which children and teachers engaged in war-related activities depended on many factors, including a teacher’s personal qualities and skills as well as the nature of the community. Résumé Cet article traite des expériences de deux enseignantes qui ont travaillé auprès de réfugiés tchèques d’origine allemande installés à Tate Creek, Colombie-Britannique, après l’annexion par l’Allemagne des Sudètes en 1938. À une époque précédant l’apparition du terme « anglais langue seconde (ASL) » Amy (Brown) Dauphinee et Celia (Stickney) Dowding employaient des techniques pédagogiques qui s’apparentaient à celles utilisées de nos jours par les experts d’ASL. L’étude soulève également des questions quant au rôle joué par les écoles dans l’effort de guerre canadien. L’étendue de l’engagement du personnel et des élèves dans des activités liées à la guerre dépendait de plusieurs facteurs dont la personnalité et les aptitudes des enseignants, ainsi que du caractère de la communauté où l’école se trouvait.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".