Abstract P1-11-10: Young women with breast cancer: Needs and experiences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background About 11% of all breast cancers in the United States are diagnosed in women younger than the age of 45. Young women with breast cancer (YWBC) may experience unique physical and psychosocial problems. Meeting the needs of these young women is often dependent on a patient’s oncology team. There is a lack of data about the experiences of YWBC in our region including whether their needs are met and which resources are available and offered to them. Objectives To explore the unique physical and psychosocial needs of YWBC in our region (Hamilton and Niagara) and to describe what information YWBC receive, and which decisions are made, regarding: fertility, breast reconstruction, mastectomy, sexuality and emotional support. Methods This study includes women 40 years of age or less who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer within 12 months. Using a qualitative design, participants attended a 1 hour focus group or a 30 minute interview moderated by the research coordinator, JR. Recordings were transcribed verbatim, with anonymization of any identifying information. Fourteen participants (ages 30 to 40) were included. Co-PI (PR) and JR reviewed the transcripts, complied recurring categories, and discrepancies were resolved via consensus. Results Most participants underwent a timely work-up and diagnosis (64%) but some experienced a delay in diagnosis (37%) as they were seen as unlikely to have cancer due to age. A majority of the participants felt they were provided enough information for informed decisions about treatment. However, over one third of the women were not provided any information about social or community supports and a similar proportion also felt that fertility and sexuality issues were not adequately addressed. Over one third planned on having bilateral mastectomy and/or immediate reconstruction, regardless of physician recommendation. The most distressing aspects of the cancer experience included: telling children and parents about the diagnosis; waiting for test results; fear of recurrence; and re-starting life after breast cancer. Recurring Themes From YWBCRecurring ThemesFG1FG2FG3INT1INT2INT3INT4Initial DiagnosisTimely Diagnosis•• •• • • •••Delay in Diagnosis• •• • • Poorly Communicated• •• • TreatmentUndergoing B/L mastectomy•••• • Undergoing reconstruction•• •• • CommunicationWell informed about Rx plan• • •• • •• •• Not well-informed about Rx plan • ••••Well informed about fertility • Not well-informed about fertility ••• •Needs met re: sexuality • Needs unmet re: sexuality• • •Info provided re: supports• • • •••• Info not provided re: supports • • • • •Supports UtilizedSocial Worker • ••• Community Services• • •••••• None • • • • • FG=Focus Group; INT=Interview Conclusion YWBC feel that they are provided with adequate medical information for treatment decision-making. However there is a gap in supports for psychosocial, fertility, and sexuality-related needs. Interventions targeted to address these unmet needs should be evaluated. In the second phase of this study, we will create an instrument to further assess the needs of young women with breast cancer in our region. Citation Format: Punam Rana, Jonathan Sussman, Jenna Ratcliffe, Margaret Forbes, Mark Levine, Nicole Hodgson. Young women with breast cancer: Needs and experiences [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-11-10.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".