MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Collaborative multicenter trials in Latin America: challenges and opportunities in orthopedic and trauma surgery

2013· review· en· W1607535254 on OpenAlexaffabout
Vinícius Ynoe de Moraes, João Carlos Belloti, Flávio Faloppa, Mohit Bhandari

Bibliographic record

VenueSao Paulo Medical Journal · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutreachContext (archaeology)Latin AmericansMedicineOrthopedic surgeryPromotion (chess)Exploratory researchAction planMedical educationPolitical scienceSurgerySociologySocial scienceManagementGeographyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.390
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.478
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3900.478
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.006
Bibliometrics0.0080.020
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0110.012
Open science0.0050.006
Research integrity0.0080.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.276
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.134 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSao Paulo Medical Journal→Same topicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies→French-language works237,207→