Muscle VO <sub>2</sub> and forearm blood flow repeatability during venous and arterial occlusions in healthy and coronary heart disease subjects
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims were: 1) to assess forearm blood flow (FBF) and muscle oxygen consumption (mVO2) repeatability assessed with near-infra red spectroscopy (NIRS) during venous occlusions (VO) in middle aged healthy subjects and patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD), 2) to assess the agreement between mVO2 calculated from NIRS signals during VO and arterial occlusion (AO) in 18 middle aged healthy subjects and 12 patients with CHD. FBF and mVO2 were measured using NIRS during 2 successive VO (1-min duration), followed by a 5-min AO. Repeatability for FBF and mVO2 during VO was assessed with intra class correlation (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV %) and agreement between VO and AO mVO2 was assessed with a Bland and Altman analysis. FBF and mVO2 during VO were highly reproducible in healthy (FBF: ICC 0.73, CV% 9.75; mVO2: ICC 0.89, CV% 12.6) and CHD subjects (FBF: ICC 0.95, CV% 10.26; mVO2: ICC 0.98, CV% 7.92). VO and AO mVO2 were in agreement in healthy (mean bias: 0.002 mL O2.min-1.100g-1) and CHD subjects (mean bias: 0.014 mL O2.min-1.100g-1). FBF and mVO2 measured with NIRS during VO and/or AO are highly reproducible methods to assess microvascular function in healthy subjects and stable CHD patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it