MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1608028541 · doi:10.1109/ceidp.1993.378893

Light and tree inception characteristics of XLPE at elevated temperatures

2002· article· en· W1608028541 on OpenAlexaff
S.S. Bamji, A.T. Bulinski, Hiroaki Suzuki, M. Matsuki, Z. Iwata

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroluminescenceMaterials scienceThermoluminescencePolyethylenePolymerAtmospheric temperature rangeLuminescenceCrystalliteLight emissionSpectral lineAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Light intensityHigh-voltage cableOptoelectronicsComposite materialVoltageOpticsElectrical engineeringChemistryPhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors describe the characteristics of light emission at an XLPE a (cross-linked polyethylene)-semicon interface held above and below the temperature at which the crystallites of the polymer start to melt. The spectra of EL (electroluminescence) and the light inception voltage of degassed, an N/sub 2/- and SF/sub 6/-impregnated XLPE are reported. It is shown that XLPE subjected to elevated temperature emits luminescence even without voltage application. This light is attributed to TL (thermoluminescence) which depends on the concentration of the crosslinking by-products present in the polymer. The TL spectra are only in the visible range. On the other hand, the XLPE-semicon interface held above room temperature and subjected to high electric stress emits EL, and the spectra of this light are in the visible and the UV ranges. Although the intensity of EL emitted at high temperature is lower than that emitted at room temperature, the UV light can photodegrade the polymeric insulation, which can lead to electrical tree inception.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsFrench-language works237,207