MIÈGE, Bernard (1997). La société conquise par la communication, T. 2 : La communication entre l'industrie et l'espace public. Grenoble : Presses universitaires de Grenoble. 216 p.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bernard Miege fait incontestablement partie des chercheurs qui ont marque les recherches recentes en sciences humaines et ce, au moins a deux titres. D'une part, il a largement initie, a la fin des annees soixante-dix, le renouveau de la theorie des industries culturelles en rompant avec l'approche dominante au sein de l'Ecole de Francfort (1). En effet, contrairement aux Theodor Adorno et Max Horkheimer (1974) qui envisageaient les medias de masse de facon globale, Bernard Miege et son equipe ont montre qu'il est necessaire d'abandonner une vision trop generique des medias dans la mesure ou ceux-ci obeissent a des modes de developpement qui different les uns des autres. D'autre part, Bernard Miege a ete l'un des acteurs les plus importants du developpement des Sciences de l'information et de la communication (SIC) en tant que discipline autonome en France grâce a l'ensemble de son action : son engagement au sein de l'UFR (Unite de Formation et de Recherche) des SIC a l'Universite Stendhal de Grenoble, son travail a la tete du Groupe de recherches et d'etudes sur les enjeux des sciences de la communication (GRESEC) et son passage a la presidence de la Societe francaise des Sciences de l'information et de la communication (SFSIC) en temoignent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".