MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1608369588

Would you repeat that, please?: Developing structure and creative repetition in the voice studio

2013· article· en· W1608369588 on OpenAlexaff
Daryl A. Edwards

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiverse Musicological Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRepetition (rhetorical device)StudioCommunicationVisual artsPsychologyLinguisticsSpeech recognitionArtComputer sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is the desire of singers and their teachers that in performance, the singer will provocatively convey the song's text, musical notation, and intended spirit.In turn, the audience hopes to be gathered in to the spectacle and pathos, or to share in the universal life experiences expressed through this art and artistry.Emily Dickinson wrote, "Art is a house that tries to be haunted."(cited in Boyd, 1990, p.9) As performers seek this elusive haunting experience, they often forget that in order for a house to be haunted and haunting, it first has to be built.In On Studying Singing (Kagen, 1950, pp.49-51), Sergius Kagen outlines a step-by-step approach for learning a song with respect to pitch, rhythm, text and translation.In "Art an Intellectual Virtue," Jacques Maritain calls this acquired learning discipline "the habit of art":Operative habit resides chiefly in the mind or the will ... Habits are interior growths of spontaneous life ... and only the living (that is to say, minds which alone are perfectly alive) can acquire them, because they alone are capable of raising the level of their being by their own activity: they possess, in such an enrichment of their faculties, secondary motives to action, which they bring into play when they want...The object [the good of the work] in relation to which (the habit) perfects the subject is itself unchangeable -and it is upon this object that the quality developed in the subject catches.Such a habit is a virtue, that is to say a quality which, triumphing over the original indetermination of the intellective faculty, at once sharpening and hardening the point of its activity, raises it in respect of a definite object to a maximum of perfection, and so of operative efficiency.Art is a virtue of the practical intellect.(Maritain, 1933, pp.10-11) The cultural encouragement for instant gratification is all around us, but whether the singer aspires to perform in opera, oratorio, or recital, it is impossible for them to have the freedom of the stage without first having the discipline of the practice room.Oscar Hammerstein II indicated this discipline more simply when he wrote in The Sound of Music, "Let's start at the very beginning, a very good place to start."(Rodgers and Hammerstein, 1960, p. 39)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)Same topicDiverse Musicological StudiesFrench-language works237,207