MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modelling and measuring electromechanical coupling in the rat heart

2009· article· en· W1608432638 on OpenAlexaff
Steven Niederer, Henk E.D.J. ter Keurs, Nicolas P. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Physiology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTroponin CEndoplasmic reticulumBiophysicsTroponinTension (geology)Coupling (piping)ChemistryElectromechanicsMyocyteCardiac muscleMuscle contractionTroponin IInternal medicineBiochemistryBiologyMaterials scienceMedicinePhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tension-dependent binding of Ca(2+) to troponin C in the cardiac myocyte has been shown to play an important role in the regulation of Ca(2+) and the activation of tension development. The significance of this regulatory mechanism is quantified experimentally by the quantity of Ca(2+) released following a rapid change in the muscle length. Using a computational, coupled, electromechanics cell model, we have confirmed that the tension dependence of Ca(2+) binding to troponin C, rather than cross-bridge kinetics or the rate of Ca(2+) uptake by the sarcoplasmic reticulum, determines the quantity of Ca(2+) released following a length step. This cell model has been successfully applied in a continuum model of the papillary muscle to analyse experimental data, suggesting the tension-dependent binding of Ca(2+) to troponin C as the likely pathway through which the effects of localized impaired tension generation alter the Ca(2+) transient. These experimental results are qualitatively reproduced using a three-dimensional coupled electromechanics model. Furthermore, the model predicts that changes in the Ca(2+) transient in the viable myocardium surrounding the impaired region are amplified in the absence of tension-dependent binding of Ca(2+) to troponin C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental PhysiologySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207