Elementos para la valoración y uso práctico de los ensayos clínicos. Parte II: Búsqueda, valoración y uso de los resultados
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen Un ensayo clinico aleatorizado (ECA) bien elaborado provee informacion al personal de salud interesado en obtener informacion valida sobre el efecto de intervenciones en salud que busca prevenir o tratar un problema de salud. Los usuarios de los ECA deben por tanto conocer las fuentes confiables que les permita acceder facil y rapidamente a los ECA que buscan resolver las preguntas surgidas de su propia practica clinica. Una vez identificado un ECA relevante para el problema, un lector con elementos que le permitan juzgar su validez y aplicabilidad hara un uso mas adecuado de ellos. Palabras clave: Ensayos clinicos, metodologia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.124 | 0.051 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it