Simultaneous Determination of A Novel Antitrypanosomal Compound (OSU-36) and its Ester Derivative (OSU-40) in Plasma by HPLC: Application to First Pharmacokinetic Study in Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop an HPLC-UV method for determination of a novel antitrypanosomal compound (OSU-36) and its ester prodrug (OSU-40) in rat plasma and to apply the method for pharmacokinetic evaluation of both compounds in rats. METHODS: Since an attempt to assay for OSU-36 and OSU-40 in non-stabilized plasma resulted in highly non-linear calibration curves and poor sensitivity due to instability of the compounds, the plasma was stabilized using paraoxon and ascorbic acid. The sample treatment included protein precipitation by acetonitrile; evaporation; reconstitution with acetonitrile and filtration. The chromatography conditions included Xterra RP18 3.5 µm 4.6X100 mm column and gradient mobile phase system of acetonitrile-water. RESULTS: The limits of quantification (LOQ) were 50 ng/mL and 40 ng/mL for OSU-36 and OSU-40, respectively. The intra- and interday precision and accuracies were below 13% for low, medium and high quality control samples for both compounds. While OSU-40 has been stable in all tested handling conditions, OSU-36 was unstable in plasma after 20 days storage in -80 °C or 4h 28 °C storage. The developed method has been applied for a pharmacokinetic study in rats which revealed that an ester prodrug OSU-40 is rapidly converted to OSU-36 within the plasma compartment by plasma esterases. OSU-36, in turn, relatively quickly undergoes oxidative metabolism, including within the plasma compartment. CONCLUSIONS: A supplementation of rat plasma with an esterase inhibitor to prevent degradation of ester prodrug (OSU-40), and with antioxidant to prevent oxidation of OSU-36, is necessary for reliable determination of both compounds. Due to limited stability of OSU-36 in stabilized rat plasma, long-term storage of samples or prolonged handling in room temperature conditions is not recommended.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".