MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1612076579 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.71.104513

High-pressure study of structural phase transitions and superconductivity in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">La</mml:mi><mml:mn>1.48</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.12</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cu</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2005· article· lv· W1612076579 on OpenAlexfundno aff
M. K. Crawford, Richard L. Harlow, Shanti Deemyad, V. G. Tissen, J. S. Schilling, E. M. McCarron, S. W. Tozer, D. E. Cox, Noriya Ichikawa, S. Uchida, Q. Huang

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2005
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRyerson UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSuperconductivityDiamond anvil cellPhase diagramHydrostatic pressurePhase transitionDiffractionPhase (matter)Hydrostatic equilibriumMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsPowder diffractionTransition temperatureHigh pressureThermodynamicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)CrystallographyChemistryPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have determined the crystal structures and superconducting transition temperatures of ${\mathrm{La}}_{1.48}{\mathrm{Nd}}_{0.4}{\mathrm{Sr}}_{0.12}\mathrm{Cu}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}$ under nearly hydrostatic pressures in diamond anvil cells to $5.0\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{GPa}$ and $19.0\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{GPa}$, respectively. Synchrotron x-ray powder diffraction measurements were used to establish the pressure-temperature structural phase diagram. Under pressure the superconducting transition temperature increases rapidly from ${T}_{c}\ensuremath{\approx}3\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$ to a maximum value of $22\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$ at $5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{GPa}$, a pressure slightly greater than that required to stabilize the undistorted $I\mathit{4}∕mmm$ structure in the superconducting state. Increasing the pressure further to $19\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{GPa}$ leads to a decrease in ${T}_{c}$ to $\ensuremath{\sim}12\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$. These results are discussed in relation to earlier high pressure measurements for similar materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.007
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.011
Open science0.0080.007
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7420.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207