MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1613094231

Effect of aspect ratio on three-dimensional natural convection in a horizontal enclosure with a uniform heat flux on the lower surface

2001· book· en· W1613094231 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNova Science Publishers, Inc. eBooks · 2001
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnclosurePrandtl numberMechanicsRayleigh numberNatural convectionBuoyancyAspect ratio (aeronautics)Heat fluxDimensionless quantityLaminar flowGeometryMaterials scienceHeat transferThermodynamicsPhysicsMathematicsEngineeringComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flow in a rectangular enclosure with horizontal upper and lower walls and vertical side walls and with a uniform heat flux applied across the lower horizontal surface and with the upper horizontal surface cooled to a uniform low temperature has been numerically studied. The length of one side of the horizontal cross-section is equal to the height of the enclosure while the length of the other side is in general different from the height of the enclosure. The enclosure aspect ratio is here defined as the ratio of the lengths of the sides of the horizontal cross-section. The vertical side-walls of the enclosure are adiabatic. It has been assumed that the flow is laminar and that the fluid properties are constant except for the density change with temperature which gives rise to the buoyancy forces. The unsteady forms of the dimensionless governing equations have been solved using a finite-difference procedure. The solution, in general, has the following parameters: the heat flux Rayleigh number, the Prandtl number and the aspect ratio of the horizontal cross-sectional shape. Results have only been obtained for a Prandtl number of 0.7, for Rayleigh number of up to 30000 and for aspect ratios of between 0.5 and 3. The results have been used to determine the effect of the governing parameters on the conditions under which fluid motion develops in the enclosure and to examine the flow patterns that arise in the enclosure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.381
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it