MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1613548124 · doi:10.1109/pcc.2002.998539

An artificial neural network for online tuning of genetic algorithm based PI controller for interior permanent magnet synchronous motor drive

2003· article· en· W1613548124 on OpenAlexaff
M.A. Rahman, M. Nasir Uddin, M. A. Abido

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Artificial neural networkGenetic algorithmPID controllerComputer scienceMagnetSynchronous motorPermanent magnet synchronous motorControl engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringControl (management)Temperature controlMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An artificial neural network (ANN) for online tuning of a genetic algorithm based PI controller for interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) drive is presented in this paper. The proposed controller is developed for accurate speed control of the IPMSM drive under system disturbances. In this work, initially different operating conditions are obtained based on motor dynamics incorporating various uncertainties. At each operating condition a genetic algorithm (GA) is used to optimize proportional-integral (PI) controller parameters in a closed loop vector control scheme. In the optimization procedure a performance index is developed to reflect the minimum speed deviation, minimum settling time and zero steady-state error. A radial basis function network (RBFN) is utilized for online tuning of the PI controller parameters to ensure optimum drive performance under different disturbances. The proposed controller is successfully implemented in real-time using a digital signal processor board DS1102 for a laboratory 1 hp IPMSM. The efficacy of the proposed controller is verified by simulation as well as experimental results at different dynamic operating conditions. The proposed approach is found to be a robust controller for application in the IPMSM drive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207