MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W161487184

Abstract 1489: Mechanisms Underlying Cardioprotective Effects Of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 In Ischemia-reperfusion Injury

2007· article· en· W161487184 on OpenAlexaff
Kiwon Ban, Judith Hoefer, Steffen Sebastian Bolz, Daniel J. Drucker, Mansoor Husain

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsHeart and Stroke FoundationUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGlucagon-like peptide-1AgonistIschemiaGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorReceptorIncretinType 2 diabetesPharmacologyInternal medicineReperfusion injuryEndocrinologyDiabetes mellitus
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background : GLP-1 is a member of the gut incretin hormone family, and a GLP-1 receptor agonist (exendin-4) is approved for the treatment of Type-II diabetes. Studies in man post-MI, and in rat and dog models suggest that GLP-1 is cardioprotective. However, the mechanisms underlying the effects of structurally diverse GLP-1 peptides in the heart have not been fully elucidated. Methods & Results: GLP-1(7–36) (i.e. GLP-1), its cleavage product GLP(9–36), and the degradation-resistant GLP-1R agonist exendin-4 were examined in 30 min of global ischemia followed by 40 min of reperfusion (I/R) in Langendorff isolated heart preparations from both wild-type (WT) and GLP-1 receptor knockout (GLP-1R−/−) mice. In WT mice, recovery of left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) following I/R was higher in GLP-1 pre-infused hearts than in untreated controls (79±9 vs. 42±1%; p<0.01). Pre-treatment with 5 nM but not with 0.3~3 nM exendin-4 also protected the heart from I/R injury. Although pre-infusion of GLP(9–36) induced lower recovery than untreated controls (21.4±1%), post-infusion of either GLP(9–36) or GLP-1 augmented functional recovery to a similar extent (59.1±6% and 53.3±6%). Surprisingly, the cardioprotective effects of pre- and post-treatments with both molecular forms of GLP-1 were detected in studies with GLP-1R−/− hearts (80.1±6% and 55.8±8). Of note, both GLP-1 and GLP(9–36) treatments also demonstrated potent vasodilatory effects, as manifested by increased coronary flow rates in isolated hearts and increased diameters of pre-constricted mesenteric arteries isolated from both WT and GLP-1R−/− mice. The cardioprotective effects on isolated hearts and vasodilatory effects on isolated mesenteric arteries, induced by GLP-1 was blunted by co-treatment with a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) enzyme inhibitor, that blocked conversion of GLP-1 to GLP(9–36). Increased cGMP release in the coronary effluents was also observed following addition of GLP-1 and GLP(9–36) to hearts isolated from WT and GLP-1R−/− mice. Summary: These data expand the complexity of GLP-1 biology by illustrating that the beneficial effects of GLP-1 in I/R injury are mediated in part by GLP(9–36) via a NO/cGMP-dependent vasodilatory effect that is independent of the known GLP-1R.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicDiabetes Treatment and Management→French-language works237,207→