MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1615115480

Precision low energy measurements and search for physics beyond the standard model

2002· article· en· W1615115480 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsPhysics beyond the Standard ModelEnergy (signal processing)Statistical physicsNuclear physicsQuantum mechanics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the first two parts of this dissertation I present the complete calculation of one-loop contributions to low energy charged and neutral current weak interaction observables in the framework of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM). For the former, I perform the first model-independent analysis of charged current data and use it to constrain the MSSM parameter space. I show that the constraints are incompatible with the predictions of the most widely used models of SUSY breaking mediation and discuss possible solutions to this conflict. For neutral current reactions, I study the impact of SUSY corrections on the weak charges of the electron, QeW , and the proton, QpW . I show that the relative signs of the SUSY loop effects on QeW and QpW are correlated and positive, whereas inclusion of R-parity nonconserving interactions can lead to opposite sign relative shifts. Thus, a comparison of QpW and QeW measurements could help distinguish between different SUSY scenarios. ^ In the third part, I construct the relationship between effective, nonrenormalizable, time-reversal violating (TV) parity-conserving (PC) interactions of quarks and gauge bosons and various low-energy TVPC and TV parity-violating (PV) observables. I delineate the scenarios under which experimental limits on electric dipole moments (EDM's) of the electron, neutron, and 199Hg as well as limits on TVPC observables provide the most stringent bounds on new TVPC interactions. If parity invariance is restored at short distances, the one-loop EDM of elementary fermions generate the most severe constraints. If parity remains broken at short distances, direct TVPC limits provide the least ambiguous bounds. ^ In the fourth part I evaluate the one-loop SM radiative corrections to the charged (CC) and neutral (NC) current neutrino-deuterium disintegration cross sections for energies relevant to the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) experiment. The correction to the total CC cross section is independent of the bremsstrahlung detection threshold. It slowly decreases with neutrino energy Eν from about 4% at low energies to 3% at the end of the 8B spectrum. The correction to the NC cross section amounts to about 1.5% and is energy-independent. ^

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it