Bibliographic record
Abstract
In all respects, 1928 can be considered as a stage in the increasing relationship between cinema and society in France. The State liberalized the status of the cinema and expressed a new trust in cinema as a conveyor of enhanced national identity. The association Les Amis de Spartacus, product of the French communist movement, succeeded in expanding the spread of censored Soviet movies, largely beyond the field of militantism. A highly politicized trend also emerged among cinema critics themselves, defending free judgment against the laws that cinematographic capitalism imposed on them. Society is moved by a sudden political activity. But the end of the year was characterized by a backlash that annihilated the previous efforts: the consensus over the liberalization of the status of the cinema rapidly unravels, and one notes again the basic mistrust of public administration about motion pictures. Les Amis de Spartacus did not survive the change of course that the PCF International imposed on the French Communist Party nor the establishment of the “class against class” tactics. Finally, the political movement that had appeared among the cinema critics faded away behind a new trend, a more intimate kind of criticism. However, this “critical” moment in 1928 deeply marked the history of the relationship between cinema and society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.072 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.022 | 0.022 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".