MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1615766910

The Role of Androgens in Life History Theories of Attachment

2015· article· en· W1615766910 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Janani Sankar

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFamily Dynamics and Relationships
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyEpistemologyChemistryPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Life history theories (LHTs) of attachment address how attachments to caregivers in infancy/childhood and to romantic partners in adulthood are used to negotiate mating and reproductive choices. Greater insecure-avoidant attachment has been suggested to be associated with the adoption of a low-investment, short-term reproductive strategy. The role of sex hormones, including the androgen testosterone (T), in the development of attachment-related reproductive strategies has been speculated in some LHTs. This research tested an integrated-LHT model of early environment, attachment, and reproductive strategies in men, using structural equation modeling. Androgen-related effects were hypothesized to occur prenatally and/or in adulthood, consistent with various LHTs of attachment. A sample of 195 young men (M = 21.06 years) from the University of Western Ontario completed self-report paper-and-pencil questionnaires assessing their romantic attachment style, retrospective attachment to caregivers in childhood, sexual variables (e.g., sociosexuality, age at first intercourse), and personality variables such as aggression, impulsivity, and risk-taking. Testosterone was measured in saliva, while an indirect estimate of prenatal T was derived from the 2D:4D finger length ratio. Degree of androgen receptor (AR) sensitivity, as indexed by the CAG repeat polymorphism in the AR gene, was also obtained. Results showed that adult romantic attachment style (avoidant vs. anxious) mediated the relationship between childhood attachment insecurity and men’s sexual reproductive strategy. Greater avoidance predicted a more opportunistic sexual strategy and greater anxiety predicted lower levels of the same strategy. Degree of childhood attachment insecurity, as retrospectively reported, mediated the relationship between quality of early family structure and engagement in non-sexual evocative behaviours believed to be associated with a more opportunistic reproductive strategy (non-sexual reproductive strategy). Adult T was an independent positive predictor of avoidant attachment, and of the non-sexual reproductive strategy, while weaker AR responsivity predicted higher levels of romantic attachment anxiety. Furthermore, romantic attachment configurations were found to mediate the relationship between androgenic variables and sexual behaviour. These findings highlight the figural role of attachment in life history based models of mating strategies, and provide some of the first empirical support for the hypothesis that romantic attachment in men is, in part, sex-hormonally-based.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)Same topicFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsFrench-language works237,207