MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1615870737 · doi:10.1063/1.2913208

Re-entrant type relaxor behavior in (1−x)BaTiO3–xBiScO3 solid solution

2008· article· en· W1615870737 on OpenAlexaff
Hai Yan Guo, Chao Lei, Zuo‐Guang Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceDielectricFerroelectricityCondensed matter physicsSolid solutionHysteresisDielectric spectroscopyRelaxation (psychology)Phase transitionPiezoelectricityPhase (matter)FerroelasticityDomain wall (magnetism)Anomaly (physics)Nuclear magnetic resonanceThermodynamicsMagnetizationChemistryComposite materialPhysical chemistryPhysicsElectrodeMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The solid solution of (1−x)BaTiO3–xBiScO3 was synthesized by solid state reaction and its dielectric properties were studied by impedance spectroscopy. A dielectric anomaly was found in the temperature ranges of −30–13°C and −60–20°C for 0.95BaTiO3–0.05BiScO3 and 0.90BaTiO3–0.10BiScO3, respectively. The frequency dependence of the anomaly exhibits dielectric relaxation satisfying the Vogel–Fulcher law, indicating relaxorlike behavior. The relaxor state in the (1−x)BaTiO3–xBiScO3 solid solution occurs after the ferroelectric phase transition upon cooling, indicating a re-entering phenomenon. Piezoresponse force microscopic studies show that the domain wall density decreases with the addition of BiScO3. The substitution of BiScO3 also results in some no-phase-contrast areas in the domain structure image, which grow with the increasing BiScO3 amount. Decent piezoelectric hysteresis loops were obtained in these areas. The correlation between the peculiar domain structure and relaxor behavior suggests that the no-phase-contrast areas are characteristics of the domain structure of the re-entering relaxor system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.923

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207