Mid term outcomes of initial 250 case experience with GreenLight 120W-HPS photoselective vaporization prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: comparison of prostate volumes < 60 cc, 60 cc-100 cc and > 100 cc.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of GreenLight 120W-HPS (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, Minnesota, USA) laser vaporization for men with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) according to prostate volumes < 60 cc, 60 cc-100 cc and > 100 cc. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The clinical data of 250 men with symptomatic BPH who underwent photoselective vaporization prostatectomy (PVP) by a single surgeon between July 2007 and August 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. Prostate volumes were measured by using transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). Functional evaluations were performed at 3, 6 and 12 months with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) obtained at 6 months. All men were stratified into three groups according to TRUS volume. RESULTS: Among the 250 consecutive PVP patients, 134, 76 and 40 men had prostate volumes < 60 cc, 60 cc-100 cc and > 100 cc, respectively. Mean laser time and delivered energy were 31, 44 and 59 minutes; 163, 309 and 473 kJ respectively (p < 0.01 for all). At 1 year, mean International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) improved by 69%, 63% and 50%, Qmax increased by 194%, 175% and 162% and post void residual (PVR) decreased by 88%, 81% and 71%, respectively (p < 0.01 for all). Mean decrease in preoperative PSA at 6 months was 63%, 52% and 41% (p < 0.01), respectively. Hospital stay, catheterization time and complication rates were comparable between groups, however retreatment rates were significantly higher for prostates >100 cc (1.5% versus 2.6% versus 9%; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Although larger prostates require more time and energy delivery, PVP is safe and efficacious for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) regardless of prostate size. Laser vaporization for glands > 100 cc appears to have a reduced reduction in PSA and a higher 9% rate of retreatment indicating that PVP for larger prostates remains to be optimized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".