MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1617961210 · doi:10.1002/9783527628148.hoc080

Fluidized Bed Combustion of Natural Gas and other Hydrocarbons

2010· other· en· W1617961210 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Philippe Laviolette, Rahmat Sotudeh‐Gharebagh, Rachid Mabrouk, Gregory S. Patience, Jamal Chaouki

Bibliographic record

VenueHandbook of Combustion · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombustionFluidized bedChemical looping combustionFluidized bed combustionMixing (physics)FluidizationMethaneInertParticle (ecology)BubbleChemistryChemical engineeringMaterials scienceThermodynamicsMechanicsOrganic chemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The sections in this article are Introduction Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Kinetics Mixing in Gas/Solid Fluidized Beds Mixing Fluidized Bed Combustion Fluidized Bed Combustion Modeling Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Kinetics Homogeneous Kinetics Global Homogeneous Combustion Kinetics Microkinetic Combustion Models ReducedGRIMechanism Combined Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Kinetics Inert Particles Kinetics for Methane Combustion in Inert Particles Combustion Catalysts Oxygen Carriers Mixing in Gas/Solid Fluidized Beds Superficial Gas Velocity and Bubble Size Particle Size Effect of Baffles Sparger Flow Pattern for Non‐Premixed Operation Methane Fluidized Bed Combustion Inert Particles Fluidized Bed Temperature Bubble Size and Air‐to‐Fuel Ratio Fluidization Regime COFormation NOxFormation Particle Type and Size Combustion Catalysts Oxygen Carriers/Chemical‐Looping Combustion Fluidized Bed Combustion Modeling Single‐Phase Models Two‐Phase Models Model ofDavidson andHarrison Bubbling Bed Models Bubble Assemblage Models Multiple Region Models Kinetic Models

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHandbook of CombustionSame topicChemical Looping and Thermochemical ProcessesFrench-language works237,207