Two-dimensional cross correlation analysis of protein unfolding: Portrayal of the thermal denaturation of CMP kinases in the absence and presence of substrates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The functional role of CMP kinases is to regenerate mono-phosphate nucleotides in cells by transferring phosphate residues from tri-phosphorylated nucleotides to monophosphorylated nucleotides. These enzymes possess two binding sites and maintain a highly conserved secondary structure. They are essential for cell survival. Herein we compare the infrared spectra of two similar, but not identical enzymes, the CMP kinases from Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. A two-dimensional cross correlation analysis of the infrared spectra reveals differences in the denaturation behavior of the two proteins. Different secondary structure elements show different time-delayed or advanced unfolding events in the two enzymes. When bound to the active sites, the two nucleotide-substrates CMP and ATP exert a stabilizing effect on the structure of both proteins. The changes observed upon thermal denaturation are different for the two enzymes. Model 2D correlations are used to simulate the different denaturation of the two enzymes. Thermal denaturation and aggregation can be distinguished as two processes separated in time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".