MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1619770729

Managing Innovative Distance Education Projects in a Telework Environment

2010· article· en· W1619770729 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Martha Cleveland‐Innes

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational journal of e-learning & distance education · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)Project managementWork (physics)Political scienceTeamworkEngineering managementBusinessEngineeringProcess managementComputer scienceSystems engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advances of communication technologies have allowed professionals to work on distance education projects in a telework environment. Managers of these projects must have the skills to manage the projects from a distance. They must be able to select the appropriate team members to work on the project, orient team members, and monitor team members performance. Guidelines for managing successful projects in a telework environment include involving the users, minimize changes to the project scope, follow standards, allocate enough resources to complete the project, use proper communication strategies during the project, and get commitment from senior managers. Also, it is important to complete projects in phases to build successes during the project. Projects in a telework environment must have proper scope, time, and quality management to be successful. Completing projects in a telework environment could be challenging because of the lack of face-to-face contact; however, with the appropriate technology and good project management, these projects can be successful. Resume Les avancees des technologies de communication ont permis aux professionnels de travailler a des projets d’education a distance dans un environnement de teletravail. Les gestionnaires de ces projets doivent posseder les competences pour gerer les projets a distance. Ils doivent reussir a choisir les membres de l’equipe appropries pour travailler au projet, orienter les membres de l’equipe et faire le suivi de la performance des membres de l’equipe. Les orientations pour gerer avec succes des projets dans un environnement de teletravail incluent : impliquer les utilisateurs, minimiser les modifications a l’etendue du projet, suivre les normes, allouer assez de ressources pour completer le projet, utiliser des strategies de communication appropriees pendant le projet et obtenir l’engagement des gestionnaires seniors. Aussi, il est important de realiser le projet en phases afin de creer des succes en cours de projet. Les projets dans un environnement de teletravail doivent comporter une gestion adequate de l’etendue du projet, de l’echeancier et de la qualite afin d’etre un succes. Realiser des projets dans un environnement de teletravail pourrait poser des defis en raison du manque de contact en face-a-face; toutefois, avec une technologie appropriee et une bonne gestion de projet, ces projets peuvent etre des reussites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational journal of e-learning & distance educationSame topicBIM and Construction IntegrationFrench-language works237,207