MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W162020490

Algorithmic approaches to joint source-channel coding

2005· article· en· W162020490 on OpenAlexaff
Zhe Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBinary erasure channelComputer scienceRedundancy (engineering)Channel (broadcasting)Coding (social sciences)ErasureAlgorithmDecoding methodsScalabilityErasure codeSource codeVariable-length codeShannon–Fano codingTheoretical computer scienceNetwork packetChannel capacityComputer networkMathematicsStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A typical communication system includes two subsystems: source coding and channel coding. The goal of source coding is to remove redundancy from the source to utilize the communication channel efficiently and to reduce storage requirements; the goal of channel coding is to protect the source from channel noise by introducing controllable redundancy. By Shannon's source-channel separation theorem, the two subsystems can be optimized independently and performed sequentially without any sacrifice of optimality. The theorem, however, was developed asymptotically (using arbitrarily large coding blocks), and assuming that the channel condition is known and the communication is point to point. These conditions and assumptions seldom hold in practice. Practical systems of better performance can be built by the approach of joint source-channel coding (JSCC), in which the two subsystems are designed together rather than independently in tandem, and optimized simultaneously based on both source and channel characteristics. The first JSCC technique to be studied is multiple description coding for robust transmissions over packet erasure channels. The basic idea is to create multiple descriptions of an original message, and deliver the descriptions independently through different routings. The receiver can reconstruct the message by any subset of those descriptions, and the reconstruction quality improves as the number of received packets increases. Reed-Solomon (RS) codes are used to correct channel erasure errors. We add uneven error protection (UEP) to consecutive segments of scalable source sequence with the redundancy strength of RS codes proportional to the importance of different segments. We study the problem of optimal allocation of RS code to protect scalable source sequence over packet erasure channels in the sense the expected reconstruction distortion is minimized. In Chapter 3, we consider the maximum a posteriori (MAP) decoding of variable length codes over noisy channels. MAP detection and estimation is a useful tool in joint source-channel coding (JSCC), which exploits the residual redundancy remaining in the source code to correct/alleviate transmission errors even in the absence of channel code. We study the MAP decoding of variable length encoded Markov sequences over a binary symmetric channel (BSC) with or without the knowledge of the count of transmitted source symbols. Later, the noisy channel model is extended to a BSC with insertion and deletion errors, and a MAP decoding algorithm is proposed for such a channel. In Chapter 4, we study the joint source channel decoding (JSCD) of VQ-coded two-dimensional signals like images. The basic idea is to scatter adjacent image VQ index bits into different packages, the packages are transmitted over packet erasure channels individually. At the decoder end, damaged VQ indexes are recovered by exploiting residual redundancy remaining in image VQ indexes. The straightforward MAP decoding in the two dimensional case has high complexity. To circumvent this we propose a MAP estimator exploiting residual redundancy in the two-dimensional case through high order context modeling that does not suffer from the problems of high time and space complexities and context dilution. Finally Chapter 5 concludes the dissertation by summarizing main contributions and suggesting some interesting future work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.651

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.109 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207