MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1626716316

Dynamically Unstable Planetary Systems Emerging Out of Gas Disks

2008· article· en· W1626716316 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueASPC · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlanetExoplanetPhysicsEccentricity (behavior)Planetary migrationPlanetary systemGas giantAstrophysicsGiant planetOrbital eccentricityAstronomyInstabilityAstrobiologyMechanics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most surprising properties of extrasolar planets is the eccentricity of their orbits, which vary from nearly circular (e ∼ 0) to highly eccentric ones (up to e ∼ 0.9). Planet-planet scattering with no gas disk has successfully reproduced the observed eccentricity distribution. However, this scenario alone cannot explain the distribution of planetary semi-major axes if giant planets form outside of ∼ 1 AU. Taking into account the effects of a residual gas disk after planet formation, we investigate the onset of dynamical instability in young planetary systems. Using a hybrid symplectic integrator + gas dynamics code, we demonstrate how planet-disk interactions along with planet-planet dynamical interactions could explain both the observed semi-major axis and eccentricity distributions of extrasolar planets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it