MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Available but not accessible : the tripartite system of maternity and parental leave provision in Canada

2003· dissertation· en· W16271730 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
van der Gaag, Tanya Celeste

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Pollution Bulletin · 2003
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRestructuringParental leaveWelfare stateWelfarePolitical scienceContext (archaeology)InequalitySociologyGeographyLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project provides a descriptive and critical analysis of the tripartite system of maternity and parental leave provision in Canada. It examines inequalities in access to leave and levels of protection, factors creating these divisions, and resulting outcomes. Policy changes which could address some exclusions, are considered Since the advent of major welfare state and labour market restructuring ., during the past decade, no research has provided a detailed examination of women's access to and use of the full range of maternity and parental leave provisions in Canada. The shifting context of these provisions, taking into account labour market restructuring, evolving family structures, and current trends in Canadian social policy reform, is explored. The project draws from Richard Titmuss' conceptual schema of social divisions of welfare, and Nancy Fraser and Linda Gordon's analysis of dependency discourse. To trace the evolution of Canadian maternity and parental leave policies and highlight emerging inequalities, the study analyses a number of sources including statistical reports, policy documents, summaries of policy debates, and transcriptions of House of Commons sessions. This project reveals major inequities in access to EI maternity and parental benefits, employment standards job protection, and occupational maternity and parental leave provisions. The current system not only fails to successfully create equality for employed women, it creates clear divisions among women based in part on race, ethnicity, and immigrant status. Some groups of women are more likely than others to be situated in those parts of the labour market providing employment unlikely to qualify them for maternity and parental leave provisions which are based solely on women's labour market position. The discrepancy between a changing labour market on one hand, and legislation on the other, means that fewer women are now eligible for paid benefits and job protection yet those who have remained eligible are now enjoying better benefits. This analysis of the tripartite system of providing for maternity and parental leave demonstrates that supports for childbearing are highly inequitable because of the intersection of programmatic and economic structures. Yet access is framed in a way that suggests provisions are directly related to individual effort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.288
Threshold uncertainty score0.826

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.010
Science and technology studies0.0330.016
Scholarly communication0.0110.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Pollution Bulletin→Same topicEmployment and Welfare Studies→French-language works237,207→