MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W162742832

An Efficient and Flexible Scheme to Support Biometric-Based and Role-Based Access Control

2005· article· en· W162742832 on OpenAlexaff
Deholo Nali, Carlisle Adams, Ali Miri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCiphertextEncryptionRandom oracleDECIPHERTheoretical computer scienceScheme (mathematics)Computer scienceCryptographyIdentity (music)Set (abstract data type)BiometricsAttribute-based encryptionCryptographic primitiveAccess controlMathematicsComputer securityPublic-key cryptographyCryptographic protocolProgramming language
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduced at EuroCrypt'05, threshold attribute-based encryption (thABE) is a subclass of identity-based encryption which views each identity as a set of descriptive attributes. In order to decrypt a ciphertext c encrypted for a set ω of attributes, users must have attribute keys associated with a sufficiently large subset of ω. Applications of thABE include both biometric-based and role-based cryptographic access control. This paper presents an efficient and flexible thABE scheme which is provably secure in the random oracle model. Let d be a minimal number of attributes which a decryptor must have to decipher a ciphertext. The proposed scheme requires only two pairings for decryption (instead of d pairings as in the original thABE scheme). Moreover, the new scheme enables system engineers to specify various threshold values for distinct sets of attributes. Therefore, this paper describes a practical cryptographic mechanism to support both biometric-based and role-based access control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207