MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Gastrointestinal: Atypical hyperplastic gastric polyposis: A case report and brief review of the literature

2011· review· en· W1627959135 on OpenAlexaff
SC Raftopoulos, Marios Efthymiou, C. Streutker, G May

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFoveolar cellMedicineGastric PolypHyperplastic PolypDysplasiaHyperplasiaPathologyGastroenterologyStomachGastric mucosaInternal medicineColonoscopyCancerColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 49-year-old female with a past history of colonic polyps was evaluated for iron deficiency anaemia. At oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD), multiple variable sized sessile and pedunculated polyps (Paris Ip + Is) were identified involving the gastric body, antrum and cardia (Figure 1). The duodenum was normal. Examination with endoscopic ultrasound confirmed the polyps to be confined to the mucosal layer. Several of the larger polyps were removed without preinjection by snare cautery using a 25 mm electrosurgical snare (Olympus, SD-210U-25) and forced Coagulation 35W, effect 3 (ERBE ICC 350; Erbe Elektromedizin, Tübingen, Germany) (Figure 2). Histology revealed gastric mucosa with prominent foveolar hyperplasia and focal low-grade dysplasia, however unlike what is typically seen in Menetrier's disease, parietal cell mass appeared normal. The most striking feature was localised foveolar overgrowth, hence the polyps were considered more in keeping with hyperplastic polyposis (HPS) or juvenile polyposis (JPS) syndromes (Figure 3). Endoscopic views of the gastric antrum (A) and Cardia/Fundus (B) revealing multiple variably sized sessile and pedunculated polyps (Paris Ip + Is) with active oozing of thick mucoid material. Polypectomy of larger polyps performed with (A) placement of a 25 mm Olympus electrosurgical snare. The polyps were excised using (B) forced coagulation, 35W effect 3 and steady closure of the snare until (C) complete transection achieved. Polyp showing foveolar hyperplasia with abundant lamina propria (*) and hyperplastic epithelium with dilated crypts (#). Arrow indicates an area of focal glandular crowding and nuclear atypia consistent with low-grade dysplasia. After further review of the patient's history, she was free of alopecia, onycholysis, cutaneous telangiectasia or hyperpigmentation and cardiovascular manifestations. There was no significant weight loss or chronic diarrhoea. Routine laboratory data showed anaemia (haemoglobin 86 g/l) and hypoalbuminemia (Albumin 29 g/l). Serology was negative for H. pylori. There was no significant past family history of gastrointestinal polyps or malignancy. Histologically it was difficult to make a definitive diagnosis of HPS over JPS. Based on the patient's clinical findings, HPS was favoured. Hyperplastic gastric polyposis is an uncommon disorder defined by Niv et al. as a syndrome comprising 50 or more gastric hyperplastic polyps. For the majority of cases, there have been no specific genetic abnormalities identified, however at least two case reports have suggested autosomal dominant inheritance. Both of the two families reported had an increased risk of development of diffuse gastric carcinoma; the authors suggested that patients with established dysplasia should be considered to be at increased risk for gastric cancer. However, no guidelines exist to guide screening and management of these patients. As with our patient, this syndrome has also been associated with colorectal neoplasia; both adenomas and adenocarcinomas may develop. The patient was strongly advised to undergo total gastrectomy, however she declined surgical management and therefore underwent seven OGD sessions with polyp debulking over 14 months. This resulted in an increase in her haemoglobin from 86 g/l to 133 g/l (normal 115–165) and albumin from 29 g/l to 33 g/l (normal 33–46). Contributed by

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Gastroenterology and HepatologySame topicGastrointestinal disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207