MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1628012115 · doi:10.1063/1.3427543

Precision Lamb-dip infrared spectra of the C–N stretching band of CH3NH2 with a CO2-laser/microwave-sideband spectrometer

2010· article· en· W1628012115 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhen-Dong Sun, R. M. Lees, Li‐Hong Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpectral lineMicrowaveSidebandSpectrometerSpectroscopyLaserAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryInfraredAmplitudeAtomic physicsOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report saturation dip spectroscopy in the C-N stretching band of CH(3)NH(2) with a resolution of 0.4 MHz and an accuracy of 0.1 MHz by use of a CO(2)-laser/microwave-sideband spectrometer. The wide tunability, Lamb-dip resolution, absolute frequency accuracy, and high sensitivity of our dual-mode instrument were all key features in making precise measurements for a range of lines in the densely crowded spectrum with its complex pattern of splittings arising from the large-amplitude CH(3) torsion and NH(2) inversion. We focused on achieving resolution and assignment of transitions within the highly blended Q branch of the C-N stretch and on observations of the important K=0 sequences of Aa and Ea torsion-inversion symmetry. Term values of the latter were fitted to J(J+1) power-series expansions to obtain the K=0 C-N stretching effective B values and substate origins, from which calculated ground-state substate energies were subtracted to yield values of 1044.7061 and 1044.8011 cm(-1) for the Aa and Ea subband origins, respectively. We thereby estimate a mean value of 1044.75(5) cm(-1) for the vibrational band origin and 0.7323(5) cm(-1) for the effective upper-state B value for the C-N stretching fundamental of CH(3)NH(2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207