MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 12585: Antianginal Efficacy of Ivabradine in Patients With History of Coronary Revascularization

2014· article· en· W1628768011 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ιoannis Zarifis, V. Grammatikou, Emmanouil Kallistratos, Apostolos Katsivas

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIvabradineCoronary artery diseaseAnginaRevascularizationInternal medicineCardiologyPost-hoc analysisCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyQuality of life (healthcare)Stable anginaHeart rateMyocardial infarctionBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Coronary revascularization procedures are widely performed for the symptomatic treatment of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Even after such procedures, angina symptoms often remain. Hypothesis: To evaluate the antianginal effectiveness and the effect on quality of life of ivabradine co-administered with a β-blocker, during 4-month therapy of CAD patients with a history of coronary revascularization. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis (926 post-revascularization patients) of a Pan-Hellenic, prospective, non interventional study including 2403 patients with CAD and stable angina. Data were recorded at baseline, and at 1 and 4 months after inclusion, while patients’ quality of life was assessed by means of the EQ-5D questionnaire. Results: Of 926 CAD patients who participated in the study, 28 (3%) prematurely discontinued treatment. Addition of ivabradine decreased mean heart rate from 80.3±9.5 bpm (1st visit) to 67.8±7.3 bpm (2nd visit) and 63.9±6.2 bpm (3rd visit) (P<0.001). Mean number of angina attacks and nitroglycerin consumption decreased, respectively, from 2.2±2.3/1.5±2.2 times/week (1st visit) to 0.5±1.0/0.3±0.8 (2nd visit) and 0.3±0.6/0.1±0.4 times times/week (3rd visit) (P<0.001). Moreover, the percentage of patients with angina CCS I (Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification) increased from 36% at baseline to 83% at study completion (P<0.001), while those with angina CCS III-IV decreased from 21% to 2% (P<0.001). All dimensions of the EQ-5D questionnaire were significantly improved after 4 months of treatment with ivabradine (P<0.001) (Table 1). Compliance with ivabradine treatment was high. Throughout the trial, 884 patients (95.5%) were taking their treatment “every day” or “quite often.” Conclusions: These results confirm the antianginal effectiveness as well as the beneficial effect of ivabradine on the quality of life of patients with CAD and a history of coronary revascularization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Issues in PregnancyFrench-language works237,207